Taxing Capital is Not a Bad Idea Indeed: The Role of Human Capital and Labor-Market Frictions

In a second-best optimal growth setup with only factor taxes as available instruments, is it optimal to fully replace capital by labor income taxation? The answer is generally positive based on Chamley, Judd, Lucas, and many follow-up studies. In the present paper, we revisit this important tax reform-related issue by developing a human capitalbased endogenous growth framework with frictional labor search and matching. We allow each …rm to create multiple vacancies and each worker to determine labor market participation and search intensity endogenously. We consider a benevolent …scal authority to …nance direct transfers to households and unemployment compensation only by factor taxes. We then conduct dynamic tax incidence exercises using a model calibrated to the U.S. economy with a pre-existing 20% ‡at tax on both capital and labor income. Our numerical results suggest that, due to a dominant channel via the interactions between the …rm’s vacancy creation and the worker’s market participation, it is optimal to switch partly from labor to capital taxation in a benchmark economy with a Lucas (1988)-type human capital accumulation process, independent of physical capital. In a general two-sector model as in Bond, Wang and Yip (1996) where the accumulation of either capital is in‡uenced by both capital stocks, it is optimal to switch partly from capital to labor taxation, even though it is never optimal to completely eliminate capital taxation by taxing labor income only. Such tax reforms based on our recommendations are found to generate nonnegligible welfare gains in consumption equivalence ranging from 0:15% to 0:24%. JEL Classi…cation: E62, H22, O4, J2.